On a therapist serving as a witness.
نویسنده
چکیده
Therapists (as expressed in codes of ethics) and lawyers (law professors aside) have divergent views about a treating therapist’s serving as a witness, be it as a fact witness or as an expert witness. It is discouraged in the standards of ethics of numerous professional organizations, including the American PsychologyLaw Society and the American Board of Forensic Psychology, the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, the Committee on Psychiatry and Law of the Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, and the American Psychological Association. In the Ethical Guidelines for the Practice of Forensic Psychiatry of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, it is stated: “Treating psychiatrists should generally avoid agreeing to be an expert witness or to perform evaluations of their patients for legal purposes because a forensic evaluation usually requires that other people be interviewed and testimony may adversely affect the therapeutic relationship.” For psychologists, the American Psychological Association’s code of ethics allows psychologists to serve both as consultant or expert and as fact witness in the same case, provided that they “clarify role expectations.” The American Psychology-Law Society of the American Psychological Association addresses the “potential conflicts of interest in dual relationships with parties to a legal proceeding.” The rationales given for the guideline do not distinguish the type of therapy—psychoanalysis or other talk therapy or pharmacotherapy. Also, under the guideline or rationales, it is immaterial whether the therapist-patient relationship has ended. In an article that received the Manfred Guttmacher Award, Larry Strasburger, Thomas Gutheil, and Archie Brodsky point out that therapists typically have neither the requisite information nor the inclination to validate the historical reality of a patient’s reality. Disclosures in therapy are useful, therapists know, without regard to their objective reality. Strasburger and colleagues write:
منابع مشابه
Limiting Therapist Exposure to Tarasoff Liability Guidelines for Risk Containment
The "duty to protect" third parties, first imposed by the Tarasoff case, has concerned and perplexed clinicians. A series of guidelines is offered for reducing therapist exposure to suit, based on expert witness experience in a number of cases raising this form of tort liability. These guidelines concern the assessment and management of risk, the documentation of information and activities, the...
متن کاملThe expert witness in medical malpractice litigation: through the looking glass.
Neurologists have professional, ethical, and social obligations to ensure that expert witness testimony is reliable, objective, and truthful. In the past, an absence of professional regulatory oversight combined with immunity from civil litigation allowed the partisan expert to flourish. This is no longer the case. The expert witness unquestionably faces an increasingly perilous liability clima...
متن کاملEffects, Efficacy, Efficiency and Effectiveness...in Physical Therapy - How Far Are We?
One of the primary goals of therapy is to provide a balanced combination of ‘what the client needs the most?’ ‘what the disease/disorder requires the best?’ ‘what the best available sources of information advise?’ and ‘what the therapist decides most appropriate?’ Thus therapeutic decision making 1 is just a beginning, it initiates a ‘relationship’ and an ensuing commitment and accountability o...
متن کاملTherapist adherence in individual cognitive-behavioral therapy for binge-eating disorder: assessment, course, and predictors.
While cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is the most well-established treatment for binge-eating disorder (BED), little is known about process factors influencing its outcome. The present study sought to explore the assessment of therapist adherence, its course over treatment, and its associations with patient and therapist characteristics, and the therapeutic alliance. In a prospective multice...
متن کاملThe adult and the therapist in an adolescents group: new object and transferential object
The psychology of groups and certain structural dynamic elements of their functioning are common to all groups. However, there are some variables that change according to the emotional needs and developmental tasks connected to the age of the individuals that comprise such groups. The basic feature that clearly distinguishes therapeutic groups for adults from groups comprising children or adole...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
دوره 30 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002